Last Updated |
---|
Mon Nov 15 19:48:44 PST 1999 |
Voters = 14 |
WWII PLATOON VOTING RESULTS:
Voters, By Experience - Up To Twenty Years
Favorite Rules | ||
---|---|---|
rules | percentage | |
Command Decision | 50% | |
Spearhead | 29% | |
TAC: WWII | 14% | |
Clash of Armor | 7% |
Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
rules played regularly | percentage | |
Command Decision | 64% | |
Spearhead | 45% | |
Clash of Armor | 9% |
Number of Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played regularly | percentage | |
1 rules played | 82% | |
2 rules played | 18% |
Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
rules played at least once | percentage | |
Command Decision | 100% | |
Spearhead | 83% | |
Clash of Armor | 42% | |
TAC:WWII | 8% |
Number of Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played | percentage | |
3 rules played | 50% | |
2 rules played | 33% | |
1 rules played | 17% |
Voters, By Region | ||
---|---|---|
region | percentage | |
North America | 57% | |
Europe | 36% | |
Western Pacific | 7% |
Voters, By Setting | ||
---|---|---|
usual game setting | percentage | |
With a friend or two | 50% | |
At the local club | 43% | |
At the local game store | 7% |
Number of Armies | ||
---|---|---|
number of armies owned or used | percentage | |
4 army/armies | 18% | |
6 army/armies | 18% | |
8 army/armies | 18% | |
11 army/armies | 9% | |
12 army/armies | 9% | |
15 army/armies | 9% | |
5 army/armies | 9% | |
7 army/armies | 9% |
Armies Owned/Used | ||
---|---|---|
armies owned or used | percentage | |
Germany | 91% | |
Britain | 73% | |
United States of America | 73% | |
British Commonwealth | 64% | |
Soviet Union | 64% | |
Germany - S.S. | 55% | |
Germany - Paratroops | 45% | |
Italy | 45% | |
Soviet Union - Guards | 45% | |
United States of America - Paratroops | 45% | |
Britain - Paratroops | 36% | |
Canada | 27% | |
France | 27% | |
Japan | 27% | |
United States of America - Marines | 27% | |
Rumania | 18% | |
Axis - Other | 9% | |
Insurgents | 9% |
Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
period | percentage | |
1944 France | 69% | |
1943 Russia | 62% | |
1944 Eastern Front | 54% | |
1944 Sigfried Line | 54% | |
1941 North Africa | 46% | |
1941 Russia | 46% | |
1942 North Africa | 46% | |
1942 Russia | 46% | |
1943 Mediterranean | 46% | |
1940 Africa | 38% | |
1943-45 Italy | 38% | |
1945 Eastern Front | 38% | |
1940 Blitzkrieg | 31% | |
1942 South-West Pacific | 23% | |
1945 Western Front | 23% | |
What-If/Fantasy | 23% | |
1939 Polish Campaign | 15% | |
1939-40 Winter War | 15% | |
1941-45 Burma | 15% | |
1937-40 China | 8% | |
1940 Balkans | 8% | |
1941-44 Continuation War | 8% | |
1943 Pacific | 8% | |
1943 South-West Pacific | 8% | |
1944-45 Pacific | 8% | |
1945 Manchuria | 8% | |
Pre-1939 Europe | 8% |
Number of Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of genres/periods played | percentage | |
1 periods | 15% | |
5 periods | 15% | |
7 periods | 15% | |
11 periods | 8% | |
13 periods | 8% | |
16 periods | 8% | |
19 periods | 8% | |
4 periods | 8% | |
6 periods | 8% | |
8 periods | 8% |
Scales Used | ||
---|---|---|
figure scale | percentage | |
6mm (including 1:285 and 1:300 scales) | 79% | |
20mm | 36% | |
15mm | 29% | |
10mm | 7% |
Number of Scales | ||
---|---|---|
number of figure scale(s) used (per person) | percentage | |
1 figure scale(s) used | 57% | |
2 figure scale(s) used | 36% | |
3 figure scale(s) used | 7% |
RECENT BATTLE REPORTS |
---|
Michael Blom |
Actually I´m in middle of an game (Spearhead) where I´m functioning as an umpire. The scenario is from "Where the Ironcrosses grow" (eastern front supplements and scenarios for Spearhead rule. The 11 German pz div. is attacking russian infantery suported by two hvy tank reg. I´m playing the tactical situations (all the moves and cobats e.t.c.) while the players give their units orders by contact me by phone or e-mail. [6 Apr 99] |
Glenn E. Kidd |
Battle of Skirmonovo. It is German arour and mech vs Soviet armor and mech plus Soviet cavalry. [30 Mar 99] |
Ingolfur Bjorgvinsson |
Spearhead set in Russia '41. Non historical-non competition game A Motorized Inf Reg (two Battalions) and a Motorcycle Battalion with Stuka support force a river crossing against a Russian Infantry Reg (three Battalions with support) who have to defend three different possible crossing sites. The Russans bring up a Tank Brigade to reduce the bridgehead before the Germans can bring over their Recon and Panzer Battalion. They manage to prevent this but the Germans held the bridgehead. [29 Mar 99] |
Neal Howes |
The last game I played was part of a Hube's Pocket campaign that I am currently running at the Ottawa Miniature Gamers (OMG). I use a second edition version on Clash of Armor that has yet to be published. A vast improvement over the first edition. PS. The better part of German panzer division did very well against a mechanized Soviet brigade. The breakout failed when they ran into a heavy tank reg of JSIIs fresh from the factory! Neal Howes [29 Mar 99] |
lee garnett |
Two German tank battalions, two infantry batalions and a motorcycle battalion attacked a Soviet force of two infantry battalions, one cav regiment and a tank regiment. Important lessons learned - Pz111 can't afford to trade blows with T34 and KV1s. [28 Mar 99] |
Alex Kirk |
Last night we played a real hum-dinger. Rommels attack at the 1st battle of El Alamein. Except that this time Rommel got enough gas to do the wide swing he wanted. Mass death & destruction never before seen by man. A good time was had by all! ;-) [28 Mar 99] |
Matt Davidson |
Command Decision 3. Parker's Crossroads scenerio(23rd Dec. 1944), during the Battle of the Bulge. Elements of 4 US Divisions make a stand at a Belgian Crossroads vs. elements of an SS Panzer Division. I refereed. Command Decision 3. 1944 Philipines. USA vs Japan. US combined arms groups vs dug in and entrenched Japanese infantry with tank support. I played. I have played Command Decision since CD 1 first came out. CD 2 was an improvement and CD 3 is the best yet. Playable and comprehensive. Morale and troop quality are key. Good speed of play with proper level of command handled by each player(1 or 2 battalions). I have played Spearhead as well. Although fun, quick to play and easy to learn(and teach), it makes many generalizations and has a very rigid system, making it, at times, more akin to Napoleonics in feel than WWII. Depending on what one is looking for a WWII set of rules, I would highly recomend either. [27 Mar 99] |
Marc Raiff |
As my group is learning CD3, I ran an adaptation of the battle of Kalmas on the Eastern Front in 1944. The players ran the Russians who were trying to cut off a German rearguard. The Germans were run by the referee to a scripted set of objectives and commands. This idea is based on Glenn Kidd's War College scenarios and is very helpful in teaching new players. [27 Mar 99] |
Olle Petersson |
I refereed a game for two friends of mine. One battalion of US infantry, supported by a couple of arty battalions, attacked a prepared German defender of one infantry battalion, supported by a battery of Nebelwerfers. The game ran only for a few hours, but the players became interested enough to ask for more... [26 Mar 99] |
Bill Baker DiGiulio |
Played a scenario from the Spearhead scenario book (Blaze across the Sands). It was a german and italian attack against a British defensive position in 1941. The germans took the worst of it, but cost the Brits enough causialties that the Italians were able to carry the day. I did not have the exact type of minis the scenario called for so i doctored it a bit. The Brits had an extra tank brigade, and I gave the Germans 2 Stuka sorties. [26 Mar 99] |
Derek Clements |
Campaign normandy the first 24 hrs [26 Mar 99] |
Paul Calvi |
Trial scenario on CD list [6 Mar 99] |
Nick Murray |
Last game was a recreation of the collapse of the Romanian Front in 1944. It dealt with a German Infantry Division that was defending a river line only to find it has been outflanked. The Germans were told to deploy to defend the river as they had secure flanks. They had to fight off a Soviet flank attack before having their orders changed by higher command. This then forced a withdrawal in the teeth of an enemy attack. [11 Feb 99] |
Dr. Anton van Dellen |
1944, Soviets versus Germans, Soviets hugged right back and picked off German armoured formations coming over a ridge in the open, despite taking heavy losses from the remains of a Panther battalion and Luftwaffe attacks. [11 Feb 99] |