Last Updated |
---|
Mon Nov 15 19:48:47 PST 1999 |
Voters = 12 |
WWII PLATOON VOTING RESULTS:
Voters, By Scale - 15mm
Favorite Rules | ||
---|---|---|
rules | percentage | |
Command Decision | 83% | |
Spearhead | 8% | |
TAC: WWII | 8% |
Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
rules played regularly | percentage | |
Command Decision | 89% | |
Spearhead | 22% | |
Clash of Armor | 11% |
Number of Rules Regularly Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played regularly | percentage | |
1 rules played | 78% | |
2 rules played | 22% |
Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
rules played at least once | percentage | |
Command Decision | 100% | |
Spearhead | 82% | |
Clash of Armor | 55% |
Number of Rules Tried | ||
---|---|---|
number of rules played | percentage | |
3 rules played | 55% | |
2 rules played | 27% | |
1 rules played | 18% |
Voters, By Experience | ||
---|---|---|
level of experience | percentage | |
Twenty Years or More | 33% | |
Up To Ten Years | 33% | |
Up To Twenty Years | 33% |
Voters, By Region | ||
---|---|---|
region | percentage | |
North America | 64% | |
Europe | 27% | |
Western Pacific | 9% |
Voters, By Setting | ||
---|---|---|
usual game setting | percentage | |
At the local club | 58% | |
With a friend or two | 25% | |
At the local game store | 17% |
Number of Armies | ||
---|---|---|
number of armies owned or used | percentage | |
3 army/armies | 22% | |
4 army/armies | 22% | |
11 army/armies | 11% | |
12 army/armies | 11% | |
2 army/armies | 11% | |
8 army/armies | 11% | |
9 army/armies | 11% |
Armies Owned/Used | ||
---|---|---|
armies owned or used | percentage | |
Germany | 89% | |
Britain | 78% | |
United States of America | 67% | |
Soviet Union | 56% | |
British Commonwealth | 44% | |
Italy | 44% | |
Japan | 44% | |
Britain - Paratroops | 33% | |
Germany - Paratroops | 33% | |
Germany - S.S. | 33% | |
United States of America - Marines | 33% | |
United States of America - Paratroops | 33% | |
France | 11% | |
Rumania | 11% | |
Soviet Union - Guards | 11% |
Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
period | percentage | |
1944 France | 75% | |
1944 Sigfried Line | 58% | |
1942 North Africa | 50% | |
1943 Russia | 50% | |
1941 Russia | 42% | |
1940 Blitzkrieg | 33% | |
1941 North Africa | 33% | |
1943 Mediterranean | 33% | |
1944 Eastern Front | 33% | |
1942 South-West Pacific | 25% | |
1943-45 Italy | 25% | |
1941-45 Burma | 17% | |
1942 Russia | 17% | |
1940 Africa | 8% | |
1941-44 Continuation War | 8% | |
1943 Pacific | 8% | |
1943 South-West Pacific | 8% | |
1944-45 Pacific | 8% | |
1945 Western Front | 8% |
Number of Periods Played | ||
---|---|---|
number of genres/periods played | percentage | |
3 periods | 25% | |
1 periods | 17% | |
11 periods | 17% | |
7 periods | 17% | |
8 periods | 17% | |
2 periods | 8% |
Scales Used | ||
---|---|---|
figure scale | percentage | |
15mm | 100% | |
6mm (including 1:285 and 1:300 scales) | 42% | |
20mm | 25% | |
2mm | 8% |
Number of Scales | ||
---|---|---|
number of figure scale(s) used (per person) | percentage | |
1 figure scale(s) used | 42% | |
2 figure scale(s) used | 42% | |
3 figure scale(s) used | 17% |
RECENT BATTLE REPORTS |
---|
Michael Bornstein |
Defended with two US Glider Regiments against a reinforced German SS Panzer Grenadier Division. Lost two battalions but repulsed the Germans who lost half the division before withdrawing. [22 Sep 1999] |
alexis tolmatchev |
transformed scenario from ASL. In the pocket of Hube. Unready russians try to stop the attack of the 10th panzer SS division. If the russian line breaks it leads to the escape of 120 000 germans. Russian forces - 27th infantry division (suffered from the fightings not reinforced). two tanks battalion mainly T34/41 - one selfpropelled artillery regiment SU76. German forces - kampfgruppe issued from the 10th SS panzer and the 6th panzer division. Mainly panzergrenadier - stug III - panzer IV. All in 15 mmm. [11 May 99] |
Duncan Allen |
1944 Falaise Gap Scenario using Spearhead. My German armoured column was wiped out by allied aircraft [9 Apr 99] |
Glenn E. Kidd |
Battle of Skirmonovo. It is German arour and mech vs Soviet armor and mech plus Soviet cavalry. [30 Mar 99] |
Matt Davidson |
Command Decision 3. Parker's Crossroads scenerio(23rd Dec. 1944), during the Battle of the Bulge. Elements of 4 US Divisions make a stand at a Belgian Crossroads vs. elements of an SS Panzer Division. I refereed. Command Decision 3. 1944 Philipines. USA vs Japan. US combined arms groups vs dug in and entrenched Japanese infantry with tank support. I played. I have played Command Decision since CD 1 first came out. CD 2 was an improvement and CD 3 is the best yet. Playable and comprehensive. Morale and troop quality are key. Good speed of play with proper level of command handled by each player(1 or 2 battalions). I have played Spearhead as well. Although fun, quick to play and easy to learn(and teach), it makes many generalizations and has a very rigid system, making it, at times, more akin to Napoleonics in feel than WWII. Depending on what one is looking for a WWII set of rules, I would highly recomend either. [27 Mar 99] |
Marc Raiff |
As my group is learning CD3, I ran an adaptation of the battle of Kalmas on the Eastern Front in 1944. The players ran the Russians who were trying to cut off a German rearguard. The Germans were run by the referee to a scripted set of objectives and commands. This idea is based on Glenn Kidd's War College scenarios and is very helpful in teaching new players. [27 Mar 99] |
Mark Serafin |
A couple of British infantry battalions and a tank regiment trying to take a hill from a regiment of Falschirmjagers and a pair of King Tigers. German Kampfgruppe coming up in support after a couple of turns. One battalion of German paras came out of woods to take the crest line of a ridge, and were promptly chewed to pieces in the open by the Shermans. On the other flank, the British infantry played hide and seek through the woods with the Germans. The King Tigers held back, waiting for the Shermans to come to them. When the German KG arrived, the Panthers fell victim to Fireflies, and the panzergrenadiers tried close assaulting the British tanks. They suffered the same fate at the paras that tried to engage armor in the open. The Germans finally threw in the towl just as the British artillery was beginning to work over the positions of the second para battalion. Which is good, because as the British infantry commander I was not looking forward to trying to advance in the face of King Tigers. [26 Mar 99] |
Paul Calvi |
Trial scenario on CD list [6 Mar 99] |
Jerry Lane |
N. Africa Italians vs Brits Italians hold 2 hills waiting for german armor to come and help. Brits hit weaker of the hills with 2 inf Bttn and a 2 sqdn Matilda Regt. Other hill attacked by CIH with 3 Sqdn MkVI and Brens. Bad day for CIH as Italian AT and AA guns chew up light armor. The infantry attack was much more sucessful. The Italian Bttn holding the outer hill was reduced from 4 to 2 cos. and all the hvy Weaps were lost. But several Matildas were hurt and the Infantry were beat up on. Next week the M13's arrive and the Brits attack the other hill. [21 Feb 99] |